_________________________ March 27, 1997 _________________________ GSBCA 14049-TRAV In the Matter of FREDDY L. SCARBER Freddy L. Scarber, Tucson, AZ, Claimant. Charles N. Stockwell, Finance and Accounting Liaison Office, Directorate of Support Services, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Denver, CO, appearing for Department of Defense. HYATT, Board Judge. Claimant, Freddy L. Scarber, a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force, requests review of the decision of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) denying reimbursement of airfare expenses incurred in connection with a temporary duty assignment to attend a conference. DFAS has declined to reimburse the cost of Mr. Scarber's airfare because his airline tickets were not purchased from a commercial travel office under contract with the Government. Claimant attended a symposium in Orlando, Florida from June 24 through June 28, 1996. In early June he was informed that he could attend the conference if funding for his expenses was available, but was cautioned that he would receive short notice of his authorization because of tight funding at the end of the third quarter. Claimant explains that he had not previously made travel arrangements as a civil service employee and was not fully informed as to the applicable regulations. He was concerned that if he waited for the travel authorization he would be unable to obtain reasonably priced tickets and that he would miss the opportunity to attend the symposium. Accordingly, he purchased tickets on his own on June 9. Mr. Scarber subsequently received his travel orders on June 20, and departed for Orlando on June 23. In small type on the back of the form, the travel orders directed the employee to use government-procured transportation through the Traffic Management Office (TMO) and stated that failure to use TMO-procured transportation would result in nonreimbursement to the traveler. DFAS contends that Mr. Scarber was not authorized to purchase his transportation commercially. The Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) allow for reimbursement of transportation costs only when conditions beyond the employee's control prevent the use of Government-provided transportation. JTR C4704C. When an employee purchases transportation from a commercial travel office not under contract to the Government, reimbursement is not authorized unless it is demonstrated that the employee had no alternative. JTR C2207. Additionally, Mr. Scarber's commercially purchased tickets were refundable, and thus he could have returned them and used the proper channels once his orders were issued. Thus, DFAS argues that Mr. Scarber cannot demonstrate that he had no alternative. Although Mr. Scarber did not adhere to the prescribed procedures in purchasing his tickets, under certain circumstances the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) permits reimbursement of airfare, not to exceed that cost which would have been incurred had the traveler used Government-procured transportation. This one- time exception is available when the employee is an infrequent traveler and is unaware of the general prohibition against purchasing transportation commercially with personal funds without advance administrative approval. 41 CFR 301-3.4(b)(2)(ii) (1996). Mr. Scarber has explained that he was an infrequent traveler, not fully acquainted with the regulations. The Board has held that this provision of the FTR, although not duplicated in the JTR, is applicable to civilian employees of the Department of Defense. Kathleen M. Watkins, GSBCA 13983-TRAV (Jan. 13, 1997); see C. Ray Taylor, GSBCA 13688-TRAV (Jan. 13, 1997). Accordingly, Mr. Scarber should be reimbursed the cost of his air transportation up to the amount that would properly have been chargeable to the Government had the TMO procured the tickets for Mr. Scarber. __________________________ CATHERINE B. HYATT Board Judge