______________________________ February 26, 1997 ______________________________ GSBCA 13965-TRAV In the Matter of ARTHUR A. JOHNSON Arthur A. Johnson, Alexandria, VA, Claimant. Norma Bullock, Acting Chief, Office of Civilian Personnel, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC, appearing for the Department of Transportation. HYATT, Board Judge. Claimant, Arthur A. Johnson, a civilian employee of the United States Coast Guard (USCG), seeks reimbursement of certain airport parking expenses he incurred in connection with a temporary duty (TDY) assignment in January 1996. Because the pertinent regulation restricts the amount of reimbursement for parking fees to the estimated cost of round trip taxicab fares, neither the Coast Guard nor the Board may authorize the additional payment sought by claimant. On Wednesday, January 10, 1996, Mr. Johnson departed from National Airport in Washington, DC to attend a USCG conference in Hawaii. He explains that he was unable to take a taxi to the airport because none were available due to the major blizzard that had occurred in the Washington, DC area earlier in the week. Consequently, Mr. Johnson drove his own vehicle to the airport and parked there for the duration of his TDY. The total charge for parking came to $156. Of this, in accordance with applicable regulations, the Coast Guard authorized payment of $41.40, the estimated cost of round trip taxicab fare, including tip. Mr. Johnson's claim is for the remaining amount of $114.60. The relevant provision of the Federal Travel Regulation provides: The fee for parking an automobile at a common carrier terminal or other parking area while the traveler is away from his/her official station shall be allowed only to the extent that the fee plus the allowable reimbursement to and from the terminal or other parking area does not exceed the estimated cost for use of a taxicab to and from the terminal. 41 CFR 301-4.2(d) (1996). Mr. Johnson recognizes that the regulation does not on its face permit payment of the additional amount that he seeks. He argues that an exception should nonetheless be made for emergency situations when the employee cannot obtain common carrier transportation to the airport and is forced to park a vehicle for lengthy periods of time in order to perform a TDY assignment. Unfortunately, the regulation does not provide for any exceptions, even in extenuating or emergency situations, such as those caused by inclement weather. In a nearly identical situation, the General Accounting Office has noted that this regulation, promulgated by the Administrator of General Services under 5 U.S.C.  5707, has the force and effect of law and may not be waived by the agency or by the office performing the claims settlement function. B-229291 (Mar. 2, 1988); accord George R. Albert, B-207038 (May 26, 1982). As such, the Board is unable to authorize payment of the remainder of the parking fees incurred by claimant. ______________________________ CATHERINE B. HYATT Board Judge