______________ March 11, 1997 ______________ GSBCA 13768-TRAV In the Matter of DAVID SMYTHE David Smythe, Oak Harbor, WA, Claimant. Judy Hughes, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Columbus, OH, appearing for Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The agency forwarded for this Board's review a question posed with respect to the claimant, Mr. David Smythe, namely, whether an agency's payment of round trip renewal agreement travel is considered taxable income to the employee. The agency references tax reporting requirements found in an announcement of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and states that the guidance does not identify the travel payment as either a taxable or a non-taxable reimbursement. Having received conflicting opinions from various offices, the agency seeks an official determination. With respect to Mr. Smythe, the agency has reported his travel amount as income which has been taxed. Initially, Mr. Smythe responded by stating, first, that the matter does not revolve around a claim for reimbursement and that no money is involved, such that the Board may lack authority over the matter, and, second, that the IRS has resolved his case by deciding that the payment received was not earned income and not taxable as such. Thereafter, in response to a Board inquiry, Mr. Smythe opposed a dismissal of this matter, as he seeks a definitive resolution of the taxability issue because, he states, others will benefit by a consistent agency position. The agency does not oppose a dismissal. In light of Mr. Smythe's assertion that the IRS has resolved the taxability question applicable to him, there is no matter for the Board to resolve. Therefore, the Board dismisses this matter, without having to determine if the Board's authority reaches to the issue here presented, the tax treatment of renewal agreement travel reimbursement. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge