December 23, 1996 GSBCA 13642-TRAV In the Matter of LYNN D. JAMISON Lynn D. Jamison, Lakewood, CO, Claimant. Thomas R. Kalter, Director of Civilian Personnel, Fort Carson, CO; and William G. Carter, Chief, Civilian Personnel Division, Fort McPherson, GA, appearing for the Department of the Army. GOODMAN, Board Judge. Mr. Lynn D. Jamison was employed as a civilian employee with the Department of the Army Civilian Personnel Office in Fort Carson, Colorado. Mr. Jamison retired in June 1993. He filed a grievance with the Division head by memorandum dated May 29, 1993, received on June 1, 1993, seeking reimbursement for all local POV (privately-owned vehicle) travel on official business from 1986- 1993. The total amount claimed was $844.41. The claim was denied at three different levels within the agency. On July 3, 1995, Mr. Jamison requested review of his claim by the General Accounting Office (GAO). On November 1, 1995, the GAO issued a settlement certificate (Z-2869712) which contained a decision denying the claim. The basis of the decision was that the claim for the mileage accrued prior to June 1, 1987, was barred by the statute of limitations, 31 U.S.C.  3702(b). The claim for mileage accrued after June 1, 1987, was denied on the merits, with reference to applicable regulations and a review of the documentation submitted. Mr. Jamison has requested reconsideration by this Board of the GAO s decision. GAO s decision that the claim for mileage accrued prior to June 1, 1987, was barred by the applicable statute of limitations is correct. The applicable statute, 31 U.S.C.  3702(b), states that a claim must be received by the Comptroller General within six years after the claim accrues. Pursuant to 4 CFR part 31.5(a), this requirement is met when a claim is received in either the Office of the Comptroller General or the agency out of whose activities the claim arose. The claim was first received in the Department of the Army on June 1, 1993. Accordingly, that part of the claim for POV mileage that accrued prior to June 1, 1987, is barred. In denying reimbursement for mileage accrued after June 1, 1987, GAO applied paragraph C2150 of the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), the Department of Defense regulations which implement and supplement the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR). This paragraph states, in relevant part: The use of POC [privately-owned conveyance] may be authorized or approved for employees or others rendering service to the Government when engaged on official business. Travel by POC by owner or as a passenger may not be directed, but the use of such mode of transportation may be permitted when it is requested by the employee or encouraged when it is advantageous to the Government. Whenever possible, any necessary travel by POC should be authorized in the travel orders, together with the appropriate mileage rate. When such authorization is not made, the use of a POC may be approved after the fact with appropriate notation or limitations by the order approving official on the reimbursement voucher. The GAO s decision on this issue is reasonable and supported by documentation submitted. The GAO reviewed the documentation submitted by Mr. Jamison and the Army, which indicated that Mr. Jamison had not asked for authorization prior to using his own vehicle, and that there had been no previous authorization of the POV travel by competent authority and no agency determination that the POV travel was advantageous to the Government. The record also indicated that the Army had denied retroactive approval, based upon the fact that Government transportation was available. The GAO concluded that any alleged direction by Mr. Jamison s supervisor to use a POV does not allow for reimbursement, in the absence of a determination that the POV travel at issue was advantageous to the Government. We have held previously that the first requirement for reimbursement of employee travel expenses is that the travel be authorized by an appropriate Government official. Claims for unauthorized travel, either in advance or after-the-fact, cannot be settled in favor of the claimant. See, e.g., Ronald H. Milligan, GSBCA 13702-TRAV (Sept. 19, 1996) (citing the FTR, which provides that all travel shall be either authorized or approved by the head of the agency or by an official to whom such authority has been delegated. 41 CFR 301.1.101(b)(1994)). While Mr. Jamison may have acted under the assumption that he would be reimbursed, he received no authorization before or after the fact. Accordingly, GAO s decision in this matter is affirmed. ______________________ ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge