February 6, 1997 GSBCA 14032-RELO In the Matter of DONALD E. GUENTHER Donald E. Guenther, Munich, Germany, Claimant. Lillian Gonzalez, Director, Department of Defense Education Activity, Arlington, VA, appearing for Department of Defense. DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman). ORDER Donald E. Guenther, a teacher in Department of Defense (DoD) schools in Germany, has for more than two years been seeking a final determination of a claim involving living quarters allowance (LQA) due him. Mr. Guenther submitted his claim to the General Accounting Office (GAO) in October 1994. In May 1995, DoD acknowledged that Mr. Guenther was entitled to LQA in an amount to be determined, and GAO closed its file in this matter. Eleven months later, Mr. Guenther reported to GAO that DoD had not agreed to pay as much as he thought it should; he asked GAO's help in securing full payment. Shortly thereafter, the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-53,  211, 109 Stat. 514, 535 (1995), transferred claims settlement authority from GAO to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and permitted the Director of OMB to divide this authority further among executive branch agencies. The Acting Director made such an allocation in June 1996. Claims involving expenses incurred by federal civilian employees for official travel and transportation, and for relocation incident to transfers, were assigned to the General Services Administration (GSA). The GSA Administrator delegated the authority to settle these claims to the GSA Board of Contract Appeals. Claims involving compensation and leave of federal civilian employees were assigned to the Office of Personnel Management. Other claims were allocated as well. On November 29, 1996, GAO sent to us material it had regarding Mr. Guenther's claim for LQA. We docketed the case as GSBCA 14032- RELO. After reviewing the material in detail, we conclude that LQA is not an expense of travel, transportation, or relocation; since it is an allowance which accrues to an employee after he has traveled to a place and relocated there, it is more properly viewed as a species of compensation. This distinction is drawn in title 5 of the United States Code, Government Organization and Employees: the law regarding travel, transportation, and relocation expenses is contained in chapter 57, "Travel, Transportation, and Subsistence," whereas the law regarding LQA is contained in chapter 59, "Allowances." Because we do not have jurisdiction over this case, we are now dismissing it from our docket and transferring it for resolution to the Office of Personnel Management. _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge