_________________ March 27, 1997 _________________ GSBCA 13713-RELO In the Matter of J. DANIEL BEATY J. Daniel Beaty, Columbia, SC, Claimant. W. J. Cavanaugh, Chief, Fiscal Service, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, SC, appearing for Department of Veterans Affairs. PARKER, Board Judge. In July 1993, Mr. J. Daniel Beaty, an employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), was transferred from Syracuse, New York to Columbia, South Carolina. Mr. Beaty paid his landlord in Syracuse $4,000 in settlement of a four-year apartment lease, which had twenty-six months remaining. The total rent for the twenty-six month period was $22,784. The lease did not permit Mr. Beaty to sublet the apartment. Mr. Beaty paid $3,000 of this amount by check; the additional $1,000 was deducted from his security deposit of $1,750. After Mr. Beaty moved out, the landlord wrote Mr. Beaty a letter stating that Mr. Beaty had caused damage to the apartment in excess of $2,750. The landlord indicated that he would keep the $750 remaining in Mr. Beaty's security deposit and forgo collection of the balance. The VA bounced around Mr. Beaty's request for reimbursement of the $4,000 because it could not decide whether payment of that amount was "reasonable." There is nothing in the record to indicate that VA officials questioned the truthfulness of Mr. Beaty's statement that the $4,000 payment, including the $1,000 subtracted from his security deposit, was totally separate from the landlord's assessment of damage done to the apartment. In April of 1996, the VA asked the General Accounting Office (GAO) to review the claim. The claim was subsequently transferred to this Board. Discussion Under the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR), an employee who is transferred in the interest of the Government is entitled to be reimbursed certain expenses incurred in connection with the move. Among the reimbursable expenses is a payment made in settlement of an unexpired lease. These expenses may be reimbursed when: (1) applicable laws or the terms of the lease provide for payment of settlement expenses, (2) such expenses cannot be avoided by sublease or other arrangement, (3) the employee has not contributed to the expense by failing to give appropriate lease termination notice promptly after he/she has definite knowledge of the transfer . . . . 41 CFR 302-6.2(h) (1993). In addition, the agency must review applications for reimbursement to determine if the expenses incurred were reasonable in amount. 41 CFR 302-6.3(b). Mr. Beaty is entitled to reimbursement of the $4,000 he paid to settle the remainder of his lease. First, the lease did provide for payment of settlement expenses -- under the terms of the lease, Mr. Beaty would have been required to pay "settlement expenses" of all $22,784 of the remaining rent if he had not entered into a different settlement with the landlord. Second, Mr. Beaty could not have avoided payment of those expenses by subletting or other arrangement -- the lease specifically prohibited him from doing that. Third, Mr. Beaty did not contribute to the expense by failing to give appropriate lease termination notice. Fourth, the amount of the settlement was reasonable. Paying $4,000 to settle a lease with 26 months and a total rent of $22,748 remaining does not strike us as excessive. Finally, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the $4,000 settlement payment, which included $1,000 taken from Mr. Beaty's security deposit, was in any way related to the landlord's decision to forgo collection of additional monies for damage to the apartment. Decision The claim is granted. ____________________ ROBERT W. PARKER Board Judge