______________________________________________________________ MOTIONS FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION DENIED: February 16, 1995 ______________________________________________________________ GSBCA 12912-P-R GRUMMAN DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Protester, and FEDERAL COMPUTER CORPORATION, Intervenor, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent, and INTERGRAPH CORPORATION, Intervenor. William W. Thompson, Jr., of Thompson & Waldron, Alexandria, VA, counsel for Protester Grumman Data Systems Corporation. Gerard F. Doyle and Scott A. Ford of Doyle & Bachman, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor Federal Computer Corporation. Ellen D. Washington, Thomas L. Frankfurt, David P. Andross, M. Elizabeth Hancock, Stirling Adams, and Lis B. Young, Department of the Navy, Naval Information Systems Management Center, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Rand L. Allen, Lon A. Berk, and Christine E. Connelly of Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, DC, counsel for Intervenor Intergraph Corporation. Before the Full Board. ORDER PER CURIAM. Protester, Grumman Data Systems Corporation, and intervenor, Federal Computer Corporation, have separately moved for full Board consideration of the panel's decision denying the protests, Grumman Data Systems Corp. v. Department of the Navy, GSBCA 12912-P, 1994 BPD 254 (Oct. 27, 1994), motions for reconsideration denied, 1995 BPD 27 (Jan. 25, 1995). The motions for full Board consideration are DENIED.