Board of Contract Appeals
                 General Services Administration
                      Washington, D.C. 20405
                                                  

                                             


               ___________________________________

                     GRANTED:  April 1, 2003
               ___________________________________


                           GSBCA 15588


                      CACI, INC. - FEDERAL,

                                             Appellant,

                                v.

                 GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

                                             Respondent.


     Judith B. Kassel, Deputy General Counsel of CACI International, Inc., Chantilly, VA,
counsel for Appellant. 
                         
     Robert T. Hoff, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), BORWICK, and HYATT.  

HYATT, Board Judge. 

     CACI, INC. - FEDERAL (CACI) appealed the deemed denial of its claim for
$141,589.50 under Federal Supply Service (FSS) Information Technology contract number
GS-35F-4483G.  This was a purchase order issued by the Government of the Virgin Islands
for information system implementation support services for the Virgin Islands Women,
Infants, and Children (WIC) Program to be provided by CACI on a time and materials basis. 
On December 13, 2002, the Board granted CACI's motion for summary relief in part, holding
that CACI was entitled to be paid for services and materials provided under this time and
materials contract, but also that respondent was entitled to further discovery in pursuit of its
defense that CACI may have billed for services that were not actually provided.  CACI -
INC., Federal v. General Services Administration, GSBCA 15588, 03-1 BCA   32,106
(2002).  

     Respondent has now informed the Board that it does not intend to proceed with
further discovery in this matter and that it concedes the quantum amount claimed by CACI.
Respondent further states that it intends to request payment of the amount claimed from the
indefinite permanent judgment fund.  See 31 U.S.C.   1304 (2000).  Although the parties did
not enter into a settlement agreement for a stipulated judgment pursuant to the Board's Rule
136 (e), 48 CFR 6101.36(e) (2002), appellant has no objection to respondent's concession
of the quantum portion of the appeal.
  
                             Decision

     Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED.  Appellant is entitled to be paid the amount
of $141,589.50 plus applicable interest in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act of
1978, 41 U.S.C.   611 (2000).




                                   _________________________________
                                   CATHERINE B. HYATT
                                   Board Judge

We concur:




__________________________________ __________________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS                 ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge                             Board Judge