Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 GRANTED IN PART: June 28, 2002 GSBCA 15465 PARCEL 49C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Richard J. Conway and Robert J. Moss of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. Catherine C. Crow, Ruth Kowarski, and Jeremy Becker-Welts, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), BORWICK, and NEILL. DANIELS, Board Judge. The General Services Administration (GSA) and Parcel 49C Limited Partnership (Parcel 49C) entered into a contract for the construction of a new office building to be leased by Parcel 49C to GSA and to be used for the tenancy of the Federal Communications Commission. Following completion of construction and tenant modifications, a dispute arose between the parties regarding monies claimed by Parcel 49C for additional costs it had incurred in performing that work. Parcel 49C claimed $1,006,312, and later appealed from the GSA contracting officer's deemed denial of that claim. The parties submitted this case to mediation by a judge of the General Services Board of Contract Appeals. The mediation resulted in a settlement of the case and a joint motion for a stipulated award pursuant to Board Rule 136(e) (48 CFR 6101.36(e) (2001)). In the motion, the parties stipulate that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a Board decision which enters judgment in accordance with the motion and settlement agreement. The parties also stipulate that they will not appeal such a decision. The Board grants the parties' joint motion. Pursuant to the motion, we GRANT IN PART GSBCA 15465. We direct GSA to pay to Parcel 49C the sum of $645,000 in full settlement of the claims contained in this case. The conditions under which the payment shall be made, and the claims and potential claims which are extinguished as a result of our making this award, are as specified in the parties' settlement agreement. Rule 136(e). _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge We concur: _________________________ _________________________ ANTHONY S. BORWICK EDWIN B. NEILL Board Judge Board Judge