Board of Contract Appeals General Services Administration Washington, D.C. 20405 DISMISSED: May 7, 1998 GSBCA 14419 TGMI/CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Joseph C. Kovars of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant. Robert J. McCall, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Respondent. GOODMAN, Board Judge. ORDER On December 8, 1997, appellant, TGMI/Contractors, Inc., filed an appeal with this Board from a contracting officer's decision dated September 9, 1997, denying a claim in the amount of $40,706. The claim was for additional electronic security devices and related work under a contract awarded to appellant by respondent, the General Services Administration (GSA). On January 30, 1998, the parties advised the Board that they had agreed to settle the appeal. The Board, therefore, suspended proceedings pending finalization of the settlement agreement and execution of a contract modification. Counsel for respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on May 5, 1998, and attached to the motion the settlement agreement executed by appellant and respondent on February 13, 1998, and the contract modification, effective March 20, 1998. The settlement agreement reads, in pertinent part: 2 GSA and TGMI do hereby agree as follows: 1. THAT, the parties shall execute a modification to said contract incorporating the disputed additional work which TGMI shall perform and providing that GSA shall pay TGMI the lump sum of $33,132.47 for such work; and 2. THAT, the parties agree to dismiss, with prejudice, GSBCA No. 14419, now pending before the General Services Board of Contract Appeals upon execution of such modification. TGMI agrees to renounce and abandon its claim dated June 7, 1997. GSA agrees to rescind and withdraw its Contracting Officer's Final Decision dated September 9, 1997; and 3. THAT, each party forever discharges, remises, and releases the other from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action, legal and equitable, known and unknown, of any kind and nature whatsoever, which either may have against the other arising out of or related to the dispute, including the payment of interest, attorneys' fees, or other costs. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 128(a) and the motion of respondent, to which appellant poses no objection, this appeal is DISMISSED. ________________________ ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge