Board of Contract Appeals
                    General Services Administration
                         Washington, D.C. 20405
 
                  ____________________________________
 
                   GRANTED IN PART: December 28, 1999
                  ____________________________________
 
 
                              GSBCA 14326
 
 
                         BORO DEVELOPERS, INC.,
 
                                           Appellant,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        James F. Beckman, President of Beckman Construction Company,
   Fort Worth, TX, counsel for Appellant.
 
        Martin A. Hom,  Office of General Counsel,  General Services
   Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
 
   PARKER, Board Judge.
 
        The  Board docketed this appeal from a contracting officer's
   final  decision on  September 30,  1997.   Boro Developers,  Inc.
   (Boro)  sought an  equitable  adjustment  in  connection  with  a
   contract with the General Services Administration for renovations
   to the  Robert N.C.  Nix Sr. Federal  Building and  Courthouse in
   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
        The  parties     participated  in   an  Alternative  Dispute
   Resolution session on July 10, 1998, and were able to resolve all
   disputes in  this appeal.   However, because  of a  related claim
   Boro filed in the United States Court  of  Federal Claims (Docket
   No.  96-180C),  completion  of the  settlement  agreement  in the
   appeal before the Board was delayed.  
 
        On December 27,  1999, the parties filed a  joint motion for
   stipulated judgement which stated in part:
 
             The parties have reached a settlement in this
             appeal and  have agreed  to stipulate to  the
             entry of judgment as follows:
 
             The General Services  Administration will pay
             Boro  Developers, Inc.  the  sum of  $93,000,
 
             inclusive  of any  and all  Contract Disputes
             Act interest, costs, and fees.
 
             The parties also represent and stipulate that
             neither party  will seek  reconsideration of,
             or  relief from,  the  Board's decision,  and
             that neither party will appeal the decision.
 
        Pursuant to  Board Rule  136(e), the  appeal  is GRANTED  IN
   PART.  Appellant is awarded the sum of $93,000,  inclusive of any
   and all Contract Disputes Act interest, costs, and fees.
 
 
 
                                      ___________________________
                                      ROBERT W. PARKER
                                      Board Judge
 
   We concur:
   ___________________________
   ___________________________
   MARTHA H. DEGRAFF                  ALLAN H. GOODMAN
   Board Judge                             Board Judge