______________________________________

                  DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 3, 1997
                  ______________________________________


                               GSBCA 12989 


                     GREENVILLE STORAGE & INVESTMENT,

                                             Appellant,

                                    v.

                     GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

                                             Respondent.

     David C. Hammond, Elliott B. Adler, and Richard A. Medway of
Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.

     John C. Ringhausen, Office of Regional Counsel, General
Services Administration, Atlanta, GA; and Amy J. Brown, Office of
General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.

NEILL, Board Judge.

                                   ORDER

     In this case, appellant has challenged the Government s
partial termination of a long-term lease entered into by the
parties in 1987.  As an initial matter, appellant brought a motion
for  summary relief.  The motion was granted in part.  Greenville
Storage & Investment v. General Services Administration, GSBCA
12989, 96-1 BCA  27,992 (1995).  Appellant subsequently submitted
an application for costs based on the Equal Access to Justice Act
(EAJA).    

     On February 25, 1997, the parties advised the Board that, with
the exception of the EAJA application, all remaining matters
relating to the contracting officer s decision from which this
appeal arose have been settled.  The Board thereupon proposed
dismissal of the case with prejudice.  Counsel for the parties have
agreed to the dismissal with the following understanding:  (1)
appellant s  EAJA application will seek only the costs associated
with the motion for partial summary relief and with the
presentation and defense of the EAJA application itself; and (2)
respondent, in challenging the EAJA application, as currently
filed, will not rely on the fact of this dismissal.  

     Based on this understanding reached by counsel and the
settlement of all remaining issues, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.  Rule 128. 

  


                                        _____________________
                                        EDWIN B. NEILL
                                        Board Judge