GRANTED IN PART: October 3, 1996 GSBCA 13097 STRAND HUNT CONSTRUCTION, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Charles M. Greenberg of Triad Law Group, Edmonds, WA, counsel for Appellant. M. Leah Wright, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), PARKER, and VERGILIO. DANIELS, Board Judge. On May 7, 1991, the General Services Administration awarded to Strand Hunt Construction a contract for comprehensive renovation of a federal office building in Seattle, Washington. On June 8, 1994, Strand Hunt submitted to the contracting officer a claim on behalf of itself and various subcontractors in the amount of $452,283, for alleged delay and inefficiency costs incurred during performance of the contract. The contracting officer denied this claim in its entirety. Strand Hunt appealed his decision to this Board. On October 3, 1996, the parties filed a settlement agreement with the Board. The agreement provides that the parties will execute a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment in favor of Strand Hunt in the amount of $76,600, plus interest on this amount (from June 8, 1994[foot #] 1) at the rates set by the Secretary of Treasury applicable to Contract Disputes Act claims.[foot #] 2 The Stipulation was also filed on October 3, 1996. Decision The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Judgment is entered in favor of appellant and against respondent, in the amount of $76,600. Interest pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 611 (1994), shall run on this amount from June 8, 1994, until paid. Rule 36(e). _________________________ STEPHEN M. DANIELS Board Judge We concur: _________________________ _________________________ ROBERT W. PARKER JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge Board Judge ----------- FOOTNOTE BEGINS --------- [foot #] 1 The settlement agreement sets this date as June 3, 1994. Because the date of the claim was June 8, and the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment provides that interest shall run from June 8, we conclude that the date specified in the settlement agreement should be June 8, as well. [foot #] 2 The agreement separately provides that the Government will issue a change order to the contract paying Strand Hunt $13,200 for the portion of the claim which the contractor presented on behalf of one of the subcontractors, WJO Flooring. This amount was agreed upon through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings conducted, at the parties' joint request, by a Board judge.