GRANTED IN PART: August 4, 1994 GSBCA 12142 LEO A. DALY COMPANY, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Gilbert J. Ginsburg and Constance A. Wilkinson of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. Robert W. Schlattman, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges HENDLEY, VERGILIO, and GOODMAN. GOODMAN, Board Judge. This case involves disputes which have arisen between appellant, Leo A. Daly Company (Daly), and respondent, the General Services Administration (GSA), from the performance and GSA's termination for convenience of a contract for the complete renovation of the United States Court and Customhouse located in St. Louis, Missouri. In this appeal, Daly sought a total amount of $290,681, plus interest. On July 28, 1994, the Board was provided with a settlement agreement executed by representatives of the parties. The agreement references this case and states: GSA and Daly wish amicably to resolve and settle GSBCA No. 12142, and any and all known and/or unknown claims of Daly arising under or related to the contract as of the date of this Settlement Agreement. The settlement agreement further provides that GSA will pay to Daly a lump sum of $110,000, inclusive of interest through July 31, 1994. From that date, Daly shall be entitled to interest on the net settlement amount at the rates set by the Secretary of the Treasury (pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97) for the Renegotiation Board) until paid. The settlement agreement likewise states that upon execution of the agreement by the parties, the Board should enter judgment for the amount in question. Together with the settlement agreement, GSA and Daly have submitted certificates of finality containing the representations that they will not seek reconsideration from, or relief from, the award, and they will not appeal the award. Rule 36(e) permits the Board to adopt the parties' stipulation of settlement, by decision, provided the parties make the representations as contained in their certificates of finality. That rule further provides that such decisions are adjudications of the appeals on their merits. In accordance with Rule 36(e), the Board adopts the parties' stipulation by decision and enters judgment as requested. Decision Based upon the settlement agreement of the parties, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART, and judgment is entered for appellant in the amount of $110,000, inclusive of interest on that sum through July 31, 1994, costs, and attorney fees. If not paid by that date, appellant shall be entitled to interest pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 611 (1988) on the net settlement amount at the rates set by the Secretary of Treasury (pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97) for the Renegotiation Board) until paid. The Board will forward the certificates of finality, together with an authenticated copy of this decision, to the United States General Accounting Office to be certified for payment from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. 1304 (1988). _____________________ ALLAN H. GOODMAN Board Judge We concur: ______________________ _____________________ JAMES W. HENDLEY JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge Board Judge