__________________________________________________ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED: March 16, 1994 __________________________________________________ GSBCA 11923-R RANCO CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. John W. Fowler, Jr., of Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant. Robert C. Smith, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. Before Board Judges DEVINE, BORWICK, and DeGRAFF. DeGRAFF, Board Judge. On January 31, 1994, we granted this appeal. On February 14, 1994, the General Services Administration (GSA) filed a motion for reconsideration. GSA does not take issue with any of our findings of fact or with our statement of the applicable law. Rather, GSA contends that the facts and the law establish that Ranco Construction, Inc. (Ranco) repudiated its contract with GSA. At pages 10-13 of our January 31, 1994 opinion, we explain why Ranco's actions do not amount to a repudiation. As our opinion makes clear, we considered all of GSA's arguments when we decided this appeal. "Arguments already made and reinterpretation of old evidence are not sufficient grounds for granting reconsideration." Rule 32(a). For these reasons, GSA's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. _______________________________ MARTHA H. DeGRAFF Board Judge We concur: ______________________________ _______________________________ DONALD W. DEVINE ANTHONY S. BORWICK Board Judge Board Judge