DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 13, 1992
                                                  
 
 
                              GSBCA 11030
 
                  MBI BUSINESS CENTERS, INCORPORATED,
 
                                           Appellant,
 
                                   v.
 
                    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
                                           Respondent.
 
        Thomas J. Madden, James F. Worrall, and Vincent W. Mathis of
   Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, Washington, DC, counsel for
   Martin L. Goozman, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Appellant.
 
        John  E.  Cornell,  Personal  Property Division,  Office  of
   General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC,
   counsel for Respondent.
 
   DANIELS, Board Judge.
 
                                 ORDER
 
        This   case,  filed  on   December  26,  1990,   involves  a
   termination  for convenience  claim.   On November  6, 1991,  the
   parties informed the Board  that appellant was in  bankruptcy and
   that  subject to approval by appellant's creditors committee, all
   elements  of the  claim but  one had  been settled.   The parties
   asked  the Board to resolve  the issue of appellant's entitlement
   to  reimbursement for  certain legal  expenses.   On December  4,
   1991, we denied entitlement and ordered the appeal denied.
 
        On October  6, 1992, the  parties filed the  following Joint
   Motion to Dismiss:
 
             The  parties  to  this  case,  Appellant  MBI
             Business   Centers,   Inc.,   and  Respondent
             General Services Administration, have entered
             into   a  settlement   agreement  which   has
             resolved all remaining  issues not previously
             decided by the Board.  Payment of $112,428.70
             has been made by  Respondent to Appellant out
 
             of  appropriated funds.    Pursuant to  Board
             Rule   28(a)(1),    Appellant,   joined    by
             Respondent, moves that this case be dismissed
             with prejudice.
 
        In  light  of  this  motion, it  becomes  apparent  that  in
   December 1991, we should properly have denied only the portion of
   the case  on which we  ruled, and  considered the rest  to remain
   pending  before us.   We  now  DISMISS WITH  PREJUDICE all  those
   portions  of the  case  not decided  by us  last December.   Rule
   28(a).
 
                                      _________________________
                                      STEPHEN M. DANIELS
                                      Board Judge